Discussion about this post

User's avatar
javiero's avatar

I think the potential for assimilation also explains the attitude of Spaniards towards immigrants. Spain doesn't seem to have much of an "immigrant problem" and most of the Spanish population has a favorable view of immigration, and this might have to do with the composition of the immigrant population in Spain. Close to 40% are Other Europeans (EU and not-EU), close to 30% are Latin Americans and around 9% are Asians.

Other Europeans assimilate just fine, and Latin Americans already speak the language, don't have any religious impediments to intermarriage and assimilation and bring a culture that's not identical but pretty similar. And most Asians come from some of the usual model-minority countries: China, India, Philippines.

So even though immigrants constitute as much as 15% of Spanish population, close to 80% of them belong to the easy to assimilate category.

Expand full comment
Ilija Vasiljeski's avatar

The biggest evidence that in fact the US isn't any better at integrating immigrants (ethnic groups) all else equal than Europe is their inability to control Black crime rates 60+ years after the Civil Rights Act was passed. If the US was so good at integrating various ethnic groups, than why the Black crime rate is multiple times that of Whites and Asians?

While on the other hand, when it comes to certain kind of immigrants, like for example, people from the Balkans (except the Albanians in some countries like the UK), many of whom are not university educated, both societies seem to integrate them well, and it is easy to integrate them be it in North America, Europe or Australia.

It is just that, it's very hard to integrate people who have vastly different culture and behavior, and there's not much a state can do in that case to improve the situation.

Expand full comment
12 more comments...

No posts